Sunday, September 11, 2016

Buddhism and belief in God

via www.hinduwebsite.com

Buddhism and belief in God

Buddhism believes in the existence neither God nor soul in a

theistic sense.  It is basically a religion of the mind, which

advocates present moment awareness, inner purity, ethical

conduct, freedom from the problem of change, impermanence and

suffering and reliance upon one's own experience as the sole

teacher, rather than an external authority, on the Eightfold

path.



Unlike other major religions of the world, Buddhism is not

centered around the concept of God or a universal supreme

being, who is responsible for the creation and dissolution of

the world and the existence of Sentient beings.

Buddhism does not even support the existenceof an eternal and

unchanging soul. According to Buddhism the whole existence is

in a state of flux and there is nothing that is either

permanent or unchanging.



The Buddhist scriptures, however do confirm the existence of

Devas or Celestial Beings, Bodhisattvas or pure beings, both

heavens and hells and other planes of existence.

But none of these are permanent entities.  They all are

subject to change and evolution.  It is said that the Buddha

either maintained silencee or discouraged questions when he

was asked to confirm the existence of a Supreme Being.

Buddha's views on God


The Buddha did so with a purpose.  He wanted his followers to

remain focused upon Nirvana without distractions.  Therefore,

he did his best to keep them focused upon that single and

virtuous goal, without getting distracted by theological

speculation or intellectual disputation, which was the common

preoccupation for many scholars and religious teachers of his

time.

However, this does not mean that he favored the notion of God

as the ruler and creator of the worlds and beings.  The Buddha

did not believe in hidden causes but apparent causes that made

sense to the mind and the intellect.  Karma was a hidden

process, but its effects could be felt and experienced by one

and all.  Hence no supernatural testimony was required to

establish its universality or working.

Once in a  while, he expressed his opinions about creation and

the role of God.  When Ananthapindika, a wealthy young man met

the Buddha at the bamboo grove at Rajagriha, the Buddha made a

few statements about the existence of God and the real cause

behind the creation of beings in this world.  These views are

summarized as below:

1.  If God is indeed the creator of all living things, then

all things here should submit to HIS power unquestioningly.

Like the vessels produced by a potter, they should remain

without any individuality of their own.  If that is so, how

can there be an opportunity for any one to practice virtue?

2.  If this world is indeed created by God then there should

be no sorrow or calamity or evil in this world, for all deeds,

both pure and impure, must come from Him.

3.  If it is not so, then there must be some other cause

besides God which is behind HIM, in which case HE would not be

self-existent.

4. It is not convincing that the Absolute has createdus,

because that which is absolute cannot be a cause.  All things

here arise from different causes.  Then can we say that the

Absolute is the cause of all things alike? If the Absolute is

pervading them, then certainly it is not their creator.

5.  If we cnsider the Self as the maker, why did it not make

things pleasant?  Why and how should it create so much sorrow

and suffering for itself?

6.  It si neither God nor the self nor some causeless chance

which creates us.  It is our deeds which produce both good and

bad results according to the law of causation.

7.  We should therefore abandon the heressy of worshipping God

and of praying to him.  We should stop all speculation and

vain talk about such matters and practice good so that good

may result from our good deeds.

The Buddha did not encourage speculation on the existence of

Isvara, (God), among his disciples.  He wanted them to confine

themselves to what was within their field of awareness, that

is , to understand the causes of suffering and work for its

mitigation.

He preached that initially each being was a product of

ignorance and illusion and subject to suffering, karma and

transmigration.  He therfore urged his disciples to

contemplate upon the Four Noble Truths and practice the

Eightfold Path,lead a virtuous life by performing good deeds

and works towards their final liberation from all becoming and

changing.

It is difficult to categorized Buddhism as an atheistic,

theistic or agnostic tradition.  There is enough justification

to place Buddhism in any or all these categories.  As

explained in the concluding part of this article, Buddhism has

elements of both theistic and atheistic traditions of ancient

India, but none of them provide us with a comforting ground to

categorize it in either of them with conviction.

Although founded by the Buddha, Buddhism, like Hinduism, is a

complex religion, which underwent profound changes after his

death, resulting in the formation of many sects and subsects,

some of which made a radical departure from the original

teachings of the Buddha to the point of standing in their own

llight as independent religions.

Were he alive, the Buddha would be surprised to hear about

many traditions that rely upon his name to promote their

teachings but show marked disregard for his original

teachings, doctrinal matters and stand points.  What bindds

them to Buddhism and keeps them in its fold is their adherence

to the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path.

While scholars may keep arguing about the essential nature of

Buddhism, it is the firm opinion of this writer that based

upon the teachings of the Buddha, it is difficult to place

Buddhism on the same footing as Hinduism or Christianity and

consider it a theistic tradition.

The Buddha ascribed no role to God in creation, in human

suffering or in the liberation of beings.  For the Buddha the

world was a Godless world in which bothe good and evil were

produced by the acctions of individual beings.  While many

beings had no choice, human beings and those above them had a

unique opportunity to exercise their discerning intellect

(buddhi)(((?)))  abd chose right living to excape from the law

of Karma and the cycle of births and deaths.

Therefore, to awaken their minds to the idea of righteous

living and virtuous actions, he taught the worldd the Four

Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, acscribing no role to God

in either of them and putting the entire burden of resolving

indiviual suffering upon the individuals themselves.

In drawing his conclusions and formulating Dharma and the Code

of Conduct (Vinaya) for the monks, he assiduously avoided all

manner of speculation about the supernatural to the extent

possible, keeping his focus firmly fixed upon the causes as

well as solutions to the problems of human existence within

the realm of the mind and its abilities, and without alluding

to anythings beyond that.

If he believed in transcendence or eternal realities, he kept

them out of the purview of his discussion and deliberation,

even when he was pressed for a clear answer, considering that

it was a major distraction for his followers in their quest

for Nirvana and for himself, in his attempts to show them the

right way.


Belief in Gods, Bodhisattvas and Primordial Buddhas

While Buddhism does not believe in the existence of an all

pervading eternal God who is the cause of the causes, it does

believe in the existence of Noble beings or gods of heaven.

The Buddhist texts mentin the names of serveral gods, whose

names are similar in many cases to the names of their

counterparts in Hinduism.

However, while the deities of Hinduism are eternal, those of

Buddhism are not.  They live for longer duration of time, but

lie all beings, they are prone to decay and subject  to the

cycle of births and deaths.

Some of the gods whose names appear frequently in the Buddhist

Canon are Brahma, Indra, Aapo (Siva), Vijja (Saraswati), Usha,

Pathavi (Prithvi) Sri (Lakshmi) Kuvera (Kubera), and Garuda.

The texts also refer to the existence of celestial beings such

as yakkhas (Yakshas), gandhabbas Pali Canon, which refers to

not one but several Brahmans inhabiting different planes.

Like other gods, Brahma in all these worlds is subject to

change and decay.

Apart from them, Mahayana Buddhism refers to the Bodhisattvas

or compassionate beings and primordial Buddhas who inhabit the

higher heaven and act as the guardians of the world.

The Bodhisattvas are truth beings, who are fully qualified for

Nirvana.  However, out of compassion they decide to postpone

their liberation and work for alleviating the suffering of the

sentient beings upon earth.

The primodial Buddhas are personalized embodiments of

different aspects of Buddha nature, possessing Dharmakayas

(bodies of truth), such as Samantabhadra, Vajradhara,

Vairochana, and Adi-Buddha, among others.

Thegods of Buddhism have greater powers than humans, but

unlike the gods of Hinduism, they do not enjoy absolute

powers.  They have the ability to impact our lives, but they

cannot change or alter the course of life upon earth beyond a

point.

Besides, since the gods are not liberated beings, their

actions have consequences and like humans, they are also

subject to the laws of karma.  Therefore, if gods indulge in

wrong acctions, it will lead to their downfall.  The same is

not true in case of primordial Buddhas.  They are not subject

to decay and they possess immense supernatural powers.

Life in heaven is not a class privilege.  The gods are not

created by a supreme being.  They reach the world of gods

through self-effort and good karma.  Ordinary human beings,

through their good effort can be reborn in the worlds of gods.

Although it is not encouraged, Buddhism does not rule out the

possibility of humans taking birth in the world of gods and

gods, having lost their virtue and due to bad karma, taking

birth in our world.  Since life in heaven is equally

conduccive to suffering, Buddhists aim for liberation rather

than rebirth in the heavens.

Devotion in Buddhism

The origin of Buddhism is rooted in the ascetic and monastic

traditions of ancient India.  The Buddha did not advise the

the monks to indulge in ritual worship or venerate him or

other beings with devotion.

However, a few centuries after his death, a schism in Buddhism

led to the formation of Mahayana sect of Buddhism which made a

radical departure from the traditional teachings of the

Theravada or Hinayana Buddhism and projected ritual worship of

venerable Buddha in his highest and purest aspect as worthy of

worship and devotion.

The Mahayana tradition supports the worship of Buddha to

cultivate virtues, practice love and compassion and receive

enlightenment.  The purpose of worship in Buddhism seems to be

to enable the worshippers to form a clear concept of the ideal

of Buddhahood and understand the Buddha nature rather than

seeking his grace or intervention in their personal lives for

the alleviation of their suffering.

Conclusion

Buddhism is primarily a monastic and scetic religion, with

some aspects of theism, borrowed mostly from Hinduism and some

aspects of atheism similar to Jainism.  Buddhism adapted the

theistic practices of Hindusm mostly in the context of iits

own teachings and for the ultimate purpose of facilitating

nirvana through individual efforth rather than divine

intervention.

While in Hinduism, followers may strive for the four chief

aims, namely Dharma, Artha (wealth), Kama (pleasure) and

Moksha (liberation), in Buddhism folllowers aim for only two,

namely Dharma (Dhamma) and Moksa (Nirvana).

In ancient India, the atheists like the Lokayatas, on the

other hand, ignored these two and imed for Artha and Kama.

For them, life was a unique opportunity to strive for

happiness and death was the Nirvana, the end of all.  They

found no justification to suffer here and now in the hope of a

better life in the next birth or hereafter.

Thus, even in this regard, Buddhism retains its distinct

character as a spiritual religion that can be categorized

neither as a theistic traditin like Hinduism nor as an

atheistic tradition like that of the Carvakas or Lokayatas.

It is a tradition uniquely human, intellectual, practical and

rooted in verifiable, perceptual experience.

No comments:

Post a Comment